by AW
Rarely does a single piece of analysis showcase the end game. This post by Michael Arrington of Techncrunch on the morality of process journalism nails the opinion-driven pieces of NYT shrouded as factual reporting. Arrington's view of NYT journalistic process:
Pretending that you’re writing one story when you’re really writing another, and then twisting what your sources tell you to fit whatever it is that your editor told you to write isn’t ethical journalism. It may check all the boxes that were laid out for you in journalism school, but it isn’t anything other than op-ed with nothing real to back it up.